The wonder of "yearly rings" in stuffed ice has customarily been one of the pros that evolutionists

history channel documentary The wonder of "yearly rings" in stuffed ice has customarily been one of the pros that evolutionists play when they as far as anyone knows "demonstrate" that the earth is in any event (as is commonly said) 135,000 years of age and not an insignificant 6,000 odd as Christians accept. They say that those exchanging darker and lighter shaded rings that are found where they've bored profound openings in the ice in Greenland and the South Pole are shaped once every year. Extremely great and practically persuading (to the clueless) in the event that one knows nothing about the pressing of yearly ice. Not all that amazing however in the event that one peruses the daily papers frequently and thinks about history every so often. These tenacious and deceptive evolutionists decline to allude to and recognize certain "little issues" they are confronted with when they must be completely genuine (not that they ever can be, but rather recall that, we're talking theoretically here). You ask, similar to what? I'll let you know 'like what': They definitely won't let you know about the "Lost Squadron" for case...

Amid the Second World War, some partnered planes arrived in Greenland since they didn't have enough gas to get them home. When they were not able get them refueled, they basically left them there and the war seethed on without them. In 1990, however, some splendid flash proposed that they retreat and get them. One and all concurred. Notwithstanding, the same "one and all" trusted that all they needed to do was to just forget about some snow the wings, fuel them up, prime somewhat here and there, pump up or supplant a tire or two and afterward rapidly fly them home once more. What an over-rearrangements of a not really straightforward undertaking! So what was the deal? Persistence and I'll let you know: When they arrived, they had vanished. The entire squadron! Since they realized that nobody could have taken every one of them, they accepted that they should be there in a jiffy under the ice. They got advanced ground entering radar and found regrettably that they were not just in that spot under the ice by any stretch of the imagination, however that after the negligible 48 years, they were indeed in that spot okay, yet 263 feet under the ice! Would our smart evolutionists now please take out their most refined number crunchers and gap the 263 feet by the 48 years. They'll get 5,5 feet for each year, not really? Alright, alright, 5,479166666 feet for each year on the off chance that they demand dwelling on silly trifles. Presently the most profound opening ever bored on earth was a little more than 10,000 feet (this is advised to us by the evolutionists themselves when they attempt to offer us that "earth is no less than 135,000 years of age" fable of theirs). Presently those pointless excess number crunchers once more: Please divide10, 000 feet by your 5,479166666 and what do you get? Right, you get 1825 (adjusted off to the closest foot). So their 10,000 foot gap would let us know (whether we brought ourselves down to utilize that silly "evidence" of theirs) that the earth is 1825 years of age and not 135,000 years, similar to they say! They sucked their alleged data (that abruptly changed into their certain "verification") out of their thumbs once more. So what's new? (other than all the refuse they dish up to mentally condition our children with). So we see that they're again talking tripe! (what's more, once more; what's new?)